U
|
MTM Scientific AM Loop Antenna
|
|
Click
On Any Photo To Enlarge
If
you've read any of my other antenna reviews you may have surmised
by now that I am somewhat of an antenna fanatic. In addition to the
large Wellbrook ALA330S which is a reference antenna for me I also
own most of the small passive AM loops available (Select-A-Tenna,
Terk, Degen, Tecsun) as well as a few C. Crane Twin Coil Ferrite antennas
and a handful of other models from Sony, Degen and the like, and I
have tried many more. I have experimented with various random and
dipole wire antennas all my life as well. For me the excitement of
trying out a new antenna is right up there with the acquisition of
a new radio and I'm a firm believer that a good antenna is just as
important, and sometimes more important than a good radio if you want
the best possible reception. Indeed a passive loop antenna can sometimes
transform a mediocre AM portable radio into a DXing machine and many
people are astounded the first time they see a loop in action
they
can frequently lift a feeble, barely audible trace of a signal right
up to a fully listenable level, and the fact that they do it with
no power and no direct connection to the radio is also impressive.
I won't go into antenna theory but in essence a passive loop antenna
captures much more signal than the radio itself can with its tiny
built in ferrite rod antenna, then radiates that signal into the radio's
internal antenna via induction. The only requirement is that your
radio has a ferrite rod antenna as most do. If not you can connect
these loops via a direct connection and I will discuss that below,
but generally passive loops are best when used inductively.
The MTM
Scientific AM Loop Antenna is quite a different animal from all of
those however for a few reasons. First it is a large square wood frame
loop measuring slightly over 17" per side which makes it at least
twice the size of the other passive AM loops I mentioned. This seemed
like an exciting prospect as it seemed likely it would be able to
capture more signal than the smaller loops.
Secondly
the MTM Scientific will never convince anyone that it is a manufactured
product
it looks decidedly home brew with its wooden frame, visible
windings and exposed capacitor and connections, along with its traditional
nut and bolt assembly method. On the other hand antenna lovers might
like its appearance
you could easily claim you designed and built
it yourself and it would be very believable.
Third
and most intriguing, it is available as a kit. I have been building
kits all my life and this looked like an easy and fun kit to build,
and the cost savings is substantial. (The assembled antenna is $137.50
when available, the kit a cool $58.75. Additionally you can buy the
plans only along with the hard to find variable capacitor
you
supply your own wood, wire and hardware. That version costs only $24.75).
My
kit arrived very quickly and soon I had the parts, templates and instructions
spread out on my workbench. It was then I realized that I didn't possess
some of the common woodworking tools needed to assemble the kit so
a quick trip to the tool store was needed to buy a wood file, some
drill bits and a countersink drill bit. I naively had expected that
the wood parts would already have been cut to fit but instead there
were a few pieces of wood stock and paper templates to use for cutting
them out, drilling and filing to the proper dimensions. Don't get
me wrong
there is nothing difficult about this. It's just that
I am not a woodworker at all and although I have enough basic tools
to tighten a loose doorknob and such I have never used a miter box
before (luckily one was available to me although it not essential).
Cutting the notches to mount the two arms perpendicular to each other
was probably the most challenging aspect of it for me. I cut them
a bit small then filed them to fit snugly together
not the best
way to do it but finally they slid together and were at right angles
to one another. Whew! You also have to cut small notches in the ends
of the wooden cross arms to hold the windings in place with a hacksaw...that
was easy. One step that could have been explained more clearly was
the beveling required on the two support feet to allow room for the
wires to pass
considerably more wood had to be removed than I
realized and I ended going back to this step repeatedly before I could
get them to fit properly. You will also be sanding and finishing the
wood
again easy enough but it does take some time to do a nice
job on it.
I hate
to pick nits but there were a few other steps that could have been
clearer in the assembly instructions, notably exactly how many turns
of wire are supposed to be done and exactly where you stop. Following
the instructions explicitly my wire did not "end up" where
it was supposed to. In other words, if you complete exactly the specified
number of turns of wire the lose end will be on the opposite side
of the antenna from where it needs to be to attach to the variable
capacitor. You either have to undo a partial turn or add a partial
turn, which is what I did. I also performed a quick check first to
be sure the antenna would still resonate and tune from 520- 1710 (the
limits of my "test" radio) and it did so I was not concerned
about it. When building one I recommend you do this quick check for
band coverage before finalizing your assembly. I also glued my hardware
in place to help keep it from loosening as the wood seemed soft enough
that I couldn't snug them down as much as I might have otherwise.
But this is all part of this homespun feel of this unusual kit. The
reward is in the performance of the MTM Scientific Loop which in a
word is HOT!!!

MTM's
website also gives instructions for making a simple pickup coil which
allows a direct connection to a radio requiring one, generally due
to the lack of a built in ferrite rod antenna. It is simple enough...a
single turn of wire placed on the wood frame and connected via a cable
to the radio. I have not yet tested this setup - MTM does provide
a quite a bit of additional magnet wire which can be used for this.
With my other passive loops I have generally found a much lower signal
level using a direct connection than induction, perhaps due to the
fact that some world band radios have attenuation at AM frequencies
through their antenna input jacks to prevent AM signals from spilling
over into the SW bands. Other radios have additional gain for their
internal antennas compared with those coming through the antenna input
jack - also to prevent overload. Then there is the question of impedance
matching
radios can have high, low or both impedance antenna
inputs and passive loop antenna manufacturers don't seem to ever quote
the ideal impedance for their loops. Generally I prefer to use my
passive loops via induction and for radios requiring a direct connection
I stick to amplified designs. I do need to test the MTM with both
high and low impedance inputs however and for times when a direct
connection is needed I thank MTM for making it possible.

BUT THE
PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING: HOW WELL DOES IT WORK?
In
a word - Superbly! I tested the MTM Loop's performance by comparing
it against my other well-known loops on several radios which had analog
signal strength meters to make relative comparisons easiest. I used
a Grundig Satellit 800, A Sony 6800, a Panasonic RF-2200 and the just-released
Grundig Satellit 750. I confirmed my results on several other radios
ranging from the Eton E5 to a Sony 2010. On all of these radios the
MTM Scientific Loop performed amazingly well. Some signals were only
marginally stronger than the smaller loops but some were much more
potent with meter readings several db higher than the smaller loops.
Listening quality was also sometimes improved more than signal strength
comparisons alone would indicate. There were some tough, noisy signals
with which the MTM was able to extract much cleaner, clearer reception
than the other loops could. Not all signals
not even most of
them
but several. If there was a difference it was always clearly
in favor of the MTM. Because of this it was also able to help some
very sensitive radios such as the Panasonic RF-2200 and GE SRII more
than the smaller loops could. Conventional wisdom is that the more
sensitive the radio is, the less it is helped by a passive loop and
I have found this to be true. But the MTM so improves reception on
some signals that even with my best AM portables it often transformed
weak, barely audible signals to ones I could actually listen to and
enjoy.
One
of our readers has forwarded to me some very comprehensive test results
he achieved pairing his MTM Loop with his C.Crane Twin Coil Ferrite
Antenna (itself an excellent AM antenna and one of my main stays).
He describes (and his audio files seem to prove) that he has achieved
not only increased gain but some incredible "steering" accomplishments,
with the ability to peak one signal and null another with extreme
precision. He uses the MTM to capture the signal. Radiates it into
the Twin Coil's Ferrite head end, then connects the Twin Coil to his
radio. This may not be easy for the average listener to achieve but
it is a testament to what can be done with a little ingenuity and
inventiveness of thought, and it is precisely that kind of person
who is likely to most appreciate the MTM Scientific Loop.
Highly
recommended!
http://www.mtmscientific.com/
AM RADIO
LOOP ANTENNA(Catalog #AMDX1000)...$137.50 (Assembled version listed
as "Sold Out" as of this writing - contact them for details)
LOOP
ANTENNA STARTER KIT (Catalog # LPKIT)...$24.75 Includes variable capacitor
DELUXE
LOOP ANTENNA KIT (Catalog # DXKIT)...$58.75
Comments
or Questions? email me at jay@radiointel.com
Jay Allen
x

|